English

MENU

English

MENU

English

MENU

English

MENU

The real costs of bottled water: what never shows up on the invoice

The real costs of bottled water: what never shows up on the invoice

7 min

7 min

|

|

7 min

|

A bottle of water costs your office far more than the price on the label. For fifty employees, the real number is closer to €17,500 a year, once you factor in logistics, storage, and waste.

An office with fifty employees averaging three 330 ml bottles per workday goes through roughly 37,500 plastic bottles a year. The purchase price per bottle looks low, but the real costs run deeper: logistics, storage, waste processing, and reporting. Below: where those costs come from, what they mean for your OPEX, and how to bring them down as a facility manager or office manager.

Why the purchase price is not the real price

The shelf price only tells part of the story. More than 90% of what you pay for a bottle of water goes toward the packaging: production, transport, refrigeration, and disposal. The water itself is a fraction.

For an individual consumer, that barely registers. But at office scale, those costs add up. Every bottle carries a logistics chain: ordering, delivery, storage in the pantry or kitchen, refrigeration, and eventually disposal through waste streams. That chain costs time, space, and money that rarely shows up on a single invoice.

The hidden costs of bottled water for businesses

Bottled water is not just a beverage. It is a procurement stream with operational consequences that facility managers deal with daily.

Procurement and purchasing management. Bottled water requires recurring orders, supplier management, and inventory monitoring. In larger offices this runs through a catering contract, but the margin on bottled water is high and rarely negotiated.

Logistics and storage. Pallets of water take up storage space. Delivery frequency is high because water is heavy and an office goes through it fast. Every delivery costs loading time, elevator capacity, and coordination with the facilities team.

Waste processing and waste management. Empty bottles generate a constant waste stream. Even with proper sorting, the vast majority of PET bottles end up in incineration plants. Waste costs per kilogram rise year over year, and deposit return schemes add administrative complexity.

Hidden facilities burden. Refrigerators for bottled water consume energy. Storage cabinets take up square meters. Cleaning up crates and leakage is a recurring issue. These are small line items, but they stack up over twelve months.

The economic costs of plastic water bottles

According to research by the Pacific Institute, producing a plastic bottle requires three times as much water as actually goes into it [1]. Then there is the energy consumption: PET is made from naphtha, a petroleum derivative. In Europe, raw material costs and energy prices for PET production are structurally high. That makes every bottle more expensive than the retail price suggests.

Transport adds another layer. Water is heavy, and the logistics costs from production facility to distribution center to office are significant. Refrigeration during storage and in the office fridge pushes energy consumption higher still.

What does bottled water cost per employee per year?


Cost item

Bottled water

Water dispenser (e.g. Aquablu)

Drinking water

€220

Included

Delivery & handling

€60

€0

Storage & logistics

€40

€0

Admin & ordering time

€30

€0

Total per employee / year

€350

€144 – €200

For an office with 50 employees, that adds up to €17,500 per year on bottled water, versus €7,200 – €10,000 with a mains-fed water dispenser. That is a saving of €7,500 – €10,500 per year.

The savings are not just in the direct purchase price. It is the facilities hours, the storage space, and the waste stream that make the biggest difference.

Mains-fed dispensers do more than cut costs. Employees choose filtered still, sparkling, or chilled water, plus functional flavors with added vitamins, without adding a single crate to the storage room. Calculate the savings for your office →

The environmental costs of plastic water bottles

PET bottles take an estimated 450 years or more to break down [2]. Despite deposit schemes and sorting requirements, a large share of plastic worldwide is not recycled. The rest ends up in incineration plants, landfills, or oceans.

For offices, this matters beyond the environmental argument. Waste streams need to be accounted for, and plastic waste volume affects contract terms with waste processors. Fewer plastic bottles means directly less waste volume and lower processing costs. For more practical steps, read the guide on reducing plastic use at the office.

CO₂ footprint and ESG impact of bottled water in the office

ESG reporting is increasingly the norm for mid-sized and large organizations. The CO₂ footprint of office operations falls under Scope 3, and bottled water is a line item that is often overlooked.

The numbers per bottle are concrete: according to lifecycle analyses, producing one kilogram of PET generates approximately 2 to 3 kg of CO₂ [3]. Add transport, refrigeration, and waste processing on top, and every bottle contributes measurably to office emissions.

For facility managers and sustainability coordinators, this means that switching from bottled water to a mains-water-based system delivers a visible reduction in the annual ESG report. It is one of the fastest adjustments with a directly measurable impact, without requiring any behavior change from employees.

That also makes it a pragmatic story toward management: lower costs, less logistics, and an improved ESG score in a single measure.

What does a plastic bottle really cost?

When we include all hidden costs, you pay far more for every plastic bottle than the store price:

  • Three times the bottle's water volume goes into production [1].

  • Every gram of PET generates a multiple in CO₂ emissions [3].

  • A quarter bottle of oil equivalent is needed to produce, transport, cool, and process a single liter of bottled water [4].

At office scale, those numbers multiply fast. An organization that switches from bottled water to a mains-fed water dispenser saves not just on purchasing, but simplifies procurement, eliminates an entire waste stream, and improves CO₂ reporting.

Plastic bottle vs. can: which is the more sustainable choice?

Aluminum cans are easier to recycle than PET and require less energy to produce and transport. As a packaging material, aluminum scores better on environmental impact. But for office hydration, the comparison is beside the point: the most efficient option is to skip disposable packaging altogether and serve filtered mains water directly through a hydration station.


SOURCES

[1] Bottled Water and Energy Fact Sheet — Pacific Institute [2] How Long Does It Take for Plastic to Decompose? — Chariot Energy [3] Decarbonising the plastic industry: lifecycle CO₂ emissions — ScienceDirect [4] Bottled Water and Energy: Getting to 17 Million Barrels — Pacific Institute (PDF) [5] Tap water rates — Waternet

The environmental costs of plastic water bottles

PET bottles take an estimated 450 years or more to break down [2]. Despite deposit schemes and sorting requirements, a large share of plastic worldwide is not recycled. The rest ends up in incineration plants, landfills, or oceans.

For offices, this matters beyond the environmental argument. Waste streams need to be accounted for, and plastic waste volume affects contract terms with waste processors. Fewer plastic bottles means directly less waste volume and lower processing costs. For more practical steps, read the guide on reducing plastic use at the office.

CO₂ footprint and ESG impact of bottled water in the office

ESG reporting is increasingly the norm for mid-sized and large organizations. The CO₂ footprint of office operations falls under Scope 3, and bottled water is a line item that is often overlooked.

The numbers per bottle are concrete: according to lifecycle analyses, producing one kilogram of PET generates approximately 2 to 3 kg of CO₂ [3]. Add transport, refrigeration, and waste processing on top, and every bottle contributes measurably to office emissions.

For facility managers and sustainability coordinators, this means that switching from bottled water to a mains-water-based system delivers a visible reduction in the annual ESG report. It is one of the fastest adjustments with a directly measurable impact, without requiring any behavior change from employees.

That also makes it a pragmatic story toward management: lower costs, less logistics, and an improved ESG score in a single measure.

What does a plastic bottle really cost?

When we include all hidden costs, you pay far more for every plastic bottle than the store price:

  • Three times the bottle's water volume goes into production [1].

  • Every gram of PET generates a multiple in CO₂ emissions [3].

  • A quarter bottle of oil equivalent is needed to produce, transport, cool, and process a single liter of bottled water [4].

At office scale, those numbers multiply fast. An organization that switches from bottled water to a mains-fed water dispenser saves not just on purchasing, but simplifies procurement, eliminates an entire waste stream, and improves CO₂ reporting.

Plastic bottle vs. can: which is the more sustainable choice?

Aluminum cans are easier to recycle than PET and require less energy to produce and transport. As a packaging material, aluminum scores better on environmental impact. But for office hydration, the comparison is beside the point: the most efficient option is to skip disposable packaging altogether and serve filtered mains water directly through a hydration station.


SOURCES

[1] Bottled Water and Energy Fact Sheet — Pacific Institute [2] How Long Does It Take for Plastic to Decompose? — Chariot Energy [3] Decarbonising the plastic industry: lifecycle CO₂ emissions — ScienceDirect [4] Bottled Water and Energy: Getting to 17 Million Barrels — Pacific Institute (PDF) [5] Tap water rates — Waternet

FAQ

01

What are the business costs of drinking water in the office?

Total costs depend on the number of employees, consumption, and the chosen solution. Bottled water costs an office with 50 employees roughly €17,500 per year in direct and indirect costs. A water dispenser brings that down to €7,200 to €10,000.

02

How much does 1,000 liters of tap water cost compared to bottled water?

In the Netherlands, 1,000 liters of tap water costs roughly €1 to €3, depending on the water company [5]. The same volume as bottled water costs between €200 and €500, depending on the brand. The difference is entirely in packaging, transport, and margin.

03

How do I calculate the total cost of bottled water for my office?

Add the purchase costs to the estimated hours for ordering, storing, and disposing. Include waste processing costs and storage space. Compare that with an all-in subscription for a water dispenser. The comparison table above gives a starting point, or use the ROI calculator for a tailored estimate.

by

Marc van Zuylen

/

Ready to upgrade your hydration?

join the club

Ready to upgrade your hydration?

join the club

Ready to upgrade your hydration?

join the club